Truth in Context: An Essay on Pluralism and Objectivity
Academic debates about pluralism and truth have become increasingly polarized in recent years. One side embraces extreme relativism, deeming any talk of objective truth as philosophically naïve. The opposition, frequently arguing that any sort of relativism leads to nihilism, insists on an objective notion of truth according to which there is only one true story of the world. Both sides agree that there is no middle path.
In Truth in Context, Michael Lynch argues that there is a middle path, one where metaphysical pluralism is consistent with a robust realism about truth. Drawing on the work of Hilary Putnam, W.V.O. Quine, and Ludwig Wittgenstein, among others, Lynch develops an original version of metaphysical pluralism, which he calls relativistic Kantianism. He argues that one can take facts and propositions as relative without implying that our ordinary concept of truth is a relative, epistemic, or "soft" concept. The truths may be relative, but our concept of truth need not be.
" This clear and well-written book is a fascinating attempt to find a "via media" between the thesis that there is ‘ one true story of the world’ and the thesis that there is no objective truth or falsity. Lynch calls his middle way "pluralism": he argues that, although there is more than one truth, there is nevertheless such a thing as objective falsity. Despite the fact that I am constitutionally unable to accept Lynch's conclusions, I regard this as an important book. This is the book that those of us who believe in ‘ the one true story of the world’ will have to refute." -- Peter van Inwagen, John Cardinal O'Hara Professor of Philosophy, The University of Notre Dame
& quot; This clear and well-written book is a fascinating attempt to find a via media between the thesis that there is & lsquo; one true story of the world& rsquo; and the thesis that there is no objective truth or falsity. Lynch calls his middle way pluralism he argues that, although there is more than one truth, there is nevertheless such a thing as objective falsity. Despite the fact that I am constitutionally unable to accept Lynch's conclusions, I regard this as an important book. This is the book that those of us who believe in & lsquo; the one true story of the world& rsquo; will have to refute.& quot; -- Peter van Inwagen, John Cardinal O'Hara Professor of Philosophy, The University of Notre Dame
"This clear and well-written book is a fascinating attempt to find a "via media" between the thesis that there is 'one true story of the world' and the thesis that there is no objective truth or falsity. Lynch calls his middle way "pluralism" he argues that, although there is more than one truth, there is nevertheless such a thing as objective falsity. Despite the fact that I am constitutionally unable to accept Lynch's conclusions, I regard this as an important book. This is the book that those of us who believe in 'the one true story of the world' will have to refute."--Peter van Inwagen, John Cardinal O'Hara Professor of Philosophy, The University of Notre Dame
