Equal Opportunity in Higher Education
The Past and Future of California's Proposition 209
21,000+ Reviews
Bookshop.org has the highest-rated customer service of any bookstore in the world
Description
Equal Opportunity in Higher Education examines issues pertaining to equal opportunity--affirmative action, challenges to it, and alternatives for improving opportunities for underrepresented groups--in higher education today.
Its starting point is California's Proposition 209, which ended race-based affirmative action in public education and the workplace in 1996. The book carefully considers how Proposition 209 reflects national trends that have changed higher education policy and practice, from admissions to student diversity to standards. With a roster of leading scholars and administrators--including Chancellor Robert Birgeneau of the University of California, Berkeley, and President Mary Sue Coleman of the University of Michigan--Equal Opportunity in Higher Education is a crucial assessment of one of the most important issues facing higher education."
Product Details
| Publisher | Harvard Education PR |
| Publish Date | October 01, 2010 |
| Pages | 300 |
| Language | English |
| Type |  Paperback / softback |
| EAN/UPC | 9781934742723 |
| Dimensions | 0.0 X 0.0 X 0.0 inches | 0.9 pounds |
About the Author
Eric Grodsky is associate professor of sociology at the University of Minnesota.
Michal Kurlaender is associate professor of education at the University of California, Davis.
Reviews
A comprehensive examination of the consequences and implications of challenges to affirmative action for racial equity and diversity in public higher education. Although focused on California s Proposition 209, the volume offers useful insights for public and institutional policy makers in other states, as well as for education researchers. Laura W. Perna, professor, Graduate School of Education, University of Pennsylvania
"
A thorough and masterful treatment of an important and complex subject. What it chronicles is the first step in the gradual asphyxiation of race-based affirmative action. The book represents an extraordinary blending of social science, legal, and policy perspectives. It illustrates a skillful use of administrative data by an impressive array of scholars and day-to-day practitioners. There are important lessons here, not only for higher education but for the broader American public. Thomas J. Espenshade, professor of sociology, Princeton University
"
The book does a nice job juxtaposing research with important perspectives on policy to give a rich, insightful examination of what happens when universities are not allowed to use race in their deliberations. Of course, the answer is complicated given the complex nature of race in America and the admissions process. This type of nuanced analysis is needed in what are sure to be future debates about affirmative action. Bridget Terry Long, professor of education and economics, Harvard Graduate School of Education"
With over a decade of data on which to draw, this volume brings together analysts from academic institutions, researchers in the University of California and community college systems, and policy makers to reflect on what we have learned about the impacts of removing affirmative action and of new policy directions for the future. In a time of great economic uncertainty, it is easy to lose sight of the complex questions of equal access with which many state postsecondary systems struggle. from the introductory chapter byChristopher Edley Jr., dean, University of California, Berkeley, School of Law
"
"
A thorough and masterful treatment of an important and complex subject. What it chronicles is the first step in the gradual asphyxiation of race-based affirmative action. The book represents an extraordinary blending of social science, legal, and policy perspectives. It illustrates a skillful use of administrative data by an impressive array of scholars and day-to-day practitioners. There are important lessons here, not only for higher education but for the broader American public. Thomas J. Espenshade, professor of sociology, Princeton University
"
The book does a nice job juxtaposing research with important perspectives on policy to give a rich, insightful examination of what happens when universities are not allowed to use race in their deliberations. Of course, the answer is complicated given the complex nature of race in America and the admissions process. This type of nuanced analysis is needed in what are sure to be future debates about affirmative action. Bridget Terry Long, professor of education and economics, Harvard Graduate School of Education"
With over a decade of data on which to draw, this volume brings together analysts from academic institutions, researchers in the University of California and community college systems, and policy makers to reflect on what we have learned about the impacts of removing affirmative action and of new policy directions for the future. In a time of great economic uncertainty, it is easy to lose sight of the complex questions of equal access with which many state postsecondary systems struggle. from the introductory chapter byChristopher Edley Jr., dean, University of California, Berkeley, School of Law
"
Earn by promoting books
Earn money by sharing your favorite books through our Affiliate program.
Become an affiliate
