A War Like No Other: The Constitution in a Time of Terror
Owen Fiss
(Author)
Trevor Sutton
(Editor)
Description
"A scholarly and cautionary collection of essays focusing on what Fiss] views as the post-9/11 debasements of key provisions of the Constitution" (Kirkus Reviews). A leading legal scholar for more than thirty years, Owen Fiss's focus was civil procedure and equal protection. But when the War on Terror began to shroud legal proceedings in secrecy, he realized the bulwarks of procedure that shield the individual from the awesome power of the state were dissolving, perhaps irreparably, and that it was time for him to speak up. The ten chapters in this volume cover the major legal battlefronts of the War on Terror from Guant namo to drones, with a focus on the constitutional implications of those new tools. The underlying theme is Fiss's concern for the offense done to the US Constitution by the administrative and legislative branches of government in the name of public safety and the refusal of the judiciary to hold the government accountable. A War Like No Other is an essential intellectual foundation for all concerned about constitutional rights and the law in a new age. "Fiss is one of our most clear-eyed and hard-edged constitutional analysts, and this critique of the damage done to our constitutional heritage in the name of waging a war on terror is the most devastating I have seen." --Stanley N. Katz, director of the Princeton University Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies "An essential contribution from one of the country's foremost legal scholars." --Jonathan Hafetz, former senior attorney for the National Security project of the ACLU "Thought-provoking." --Publishers WeeklyProduct Details
Price
$27.95
$25.99
Publisher
New Press
Publish Date
June 16, 2015
Pages
352
Dimensions
5.7 X 1.3 X 8.3 inches | 1.15 pounds
Language
English
Type
Hardcover
EAN/UPC
9781620970973
BISAC Categories:
Earn by promoting books
Earn money by sharing your favorite books through our Affiliate program.
Become an affiliate
About the Author
Owen Fiss is Sterling Professor Emeritus of Law at Yale University.
Reviews
Praise for Owen Fiss:
"Fiss is one of the truly magisterial figures in contemporary American legal academics. He commands nearly universal respect for the depth and lucidity of his intellect, for the integrity and passion of his character, and for the breadth and purity of his scholarship."
--Robert Post, Dean of Yale Law School
Praise for "The Law As It Could Be"
"Owen Fiss is the moral compass of legal liberalism, and these indispensable essays are his--and our--guide to true north."
--Noah Feldman, author of "After Jihad: America and the Struggle for Islamic Democracy"
"An uplifting book."
--"Choice"
"Fiss writes in the style of John Marshall, sweeping the reader along with vigorous argumentation."
--"The Law and Politics Book Review"
Praise for "The Irony of Free Speech"
"Powerfully reminds us that the flowering of individual autonomy also has costs--atomism, social fragmentation and a public discourse that grows more inclusive and less intelligible at the same time."
--"New York Times"
Praise for Owen Fiss:
"Fiss is one of our most clear-eyed and hard-edged constitutional analysts, and this critique of the damage done to our constitutional heritage in the name of waging a war on terror is the most devastating I have seen."
--Stanley N. Katz, professor of public and international affairs, Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University
"Fiss provides an uncompromising critique of America's struggle to maintain its most fundamental principles during the war on terrorism. Over the course of ten essays, Fiss makes a compelling case for how policies such as military commissions, targeted killing, torture, and warrantless surveillance have exposed rifts in the constitutional fabric. An essential contribution from one of the country's foremost legal scholars."
--Jonathan Hafetz, associate professor of law, Seton Hall University
"Does the Constitution authorize the U.S. government to interfere with privacy, to torture, to try some prisoners before military commissions and to allow others to languish in prison for prolonged, indefinite periods without a trial of any type, and to assassinate some individuals in foreign countries, even U.S. citizens, who are suspected of having engaged in terrorism? Fiss opens a wide-ranging debate on these issues that is crucial for the United States and for billions of persons outside its borders."
--Luis Moreno Ocampo, first Chief Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court
"Owen Fiss has written an important and troubling book."
--Joshua Cohen, co-editor, The Norton Introduction to Philosophy
"Fiss is one of the truly magisterial figures in contemporary American legal academics. He commands nearly universal respect for the depth and lucidity of his intellect, for the integrity and passion of his character, and for the breadth and purity of his scholarship."
--Robert Post, Dean of Yale Law School
Praise for "The Law As It Could Be"
"Owen Fiss is the moral compass of legal liberalism...Fiss calmly makes the case for unvarnished reason as the only and best guide to law and life...[His work reveals] a profound faith that law can be not only the instrument of justice, but actually embody justice itself. Fiss's unswerving commitment to the possibilities of reason, justice, and law is more than timely--it is essential to the very project of the law."
--Noah Feldman, author of "After Jihad: America and the Struggle for Islamic Democracy"
"An uplifting book."
--"Choice"
"Fiss writes in the style of John Marshall, sweeping the reader along with vigorous argumentation."
--"The Law and Politics Book Review"
Praise for "The Irony of Free Speech"
"Powerfully reminds us that the flowering of individual autonomy also has costs--atomism, social fragmentation and a public discourse that grows more inclusive and less intelligible at the same time."
--"New York Times"
"In these extremely relevant pieces, Fiss once again emerges as a fierce defender of freedom."
--Kirkus "This book addresses important legal and ethical questions about the war on terror. It is designed for law students, legal professionals, and readers with a thorough understanding of legal topics. Recommended for law and academic libraries."
--Library Journal
Praise for Owen Fiss:
"Fiss is one of our most clear-eyed and hard-edged constitutional analysts, and this critique of the damage done to our constitutional heritage in the name of waging a war on terror is the most devastating I have seen."
--Stanley N. Katz, professor of public and international affairs, Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University "Fiss provides an uncompromising critique of America's struggle to maintain its most fundamental principles during the war on terrorism. Over the course of ten essays, Fiss makes a compelling case for how policies such as military commissions, targeted killing, torture, and warrantless surveillance have exposed rifts in the constitutional fabric. An essential contribution from one of the country's foremost legal scholars."
--Jonathan Hafetz, associate professor of law, Seton Hall University "Does the Constitution authorize the U.S. government to interfere with privacy, to torture, to try some prisoners before military commissions and to allow others to languish in prison for prolonged, indefinite periods without a trial of any type, and to assassinate some individuals in foreign countries, even U.S. citizens, who are suspected of having engaged in terrorism? Fiss opens a wide-ranging debate on these issues that is crucial for the United States and for billions of persons outside its borders."
--Luis Moreno Ocampo, first Chief Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court "Owen Fiss has written an important and troubling book."
--Joshua Cohen, co-editor, The Norton Introduction to Philosophy "Fiss is one of the truly magisterial figures in contemporary American legal academics. He commands nearly universal respect for the depth and lucidity of his intellect, for the integrity and passion of his character, and for the breadth and purity of his scholarship."
--Robert Post, Dean of Yale Law School "Fiss, a towering figure in the legal academy, brilliantly lays bare how our courts have failed the Constitution in the post-9-11 world."
--Lawrence Douglas, James J. Grosfeld Professor of Law, Jurisprudence, and Social Thought, Amherst College Praise for The Law As It Could Be
"Owen Fiss is the moral compass of legal liberalism...Fiss calmly makes the case for unvarnished reason as the only and best guide to law and life...[His work reveals] a profound faith that law can be not only the instrument of justice, but actually embody justice itself. Fiss's unswerving commitment to the possibilities of reason, justice, and law is more than timely--it is essential to the very project of the law."
--Noah Feldman, author of After Jihad: America and the Struggle for Islamic Democracy "An uplifting book."
--Choice "Fiss writes in the style of John Marshall, sweeping the reader along with vigorous argumentation."
--The Law and Politics Book Review Praise for The Irony of Free Speech
"Powerfully reminds us that the flowering of individual autonomy also has costs--atomism, social fragmentation and a public discourse that grows more inclusive and less intelligible at the same time."
--New York Times
"Fiss is one of the truly magisterial figures in contemporary American legal academics. He commands nearly universal respect for the depth and lucidity of his intellect, for the integrity and passion of his character, and for the breadth and purity of his scholarship."
--Robert Post, Dean of Yale Law School
Praise for "The Law As It Could Be"
"Owen Fiss is the moral compass of legal liberalism, and these indispensable essays are his--and our--guide to true north."
--Noah Feldman, author of "After Jihad: America and the Struggle for Islamic Democracy"
"An uplifting book."
--"Choice"
"Fiss writes in the style of John Marshall, sweeping the reader along with vigorous argumentation."
--"The Law and Politics Book Review"
Praise for "The Irony of Free Speech"
"Powerfully reminds us that the flowering of individual autonomy also has costs--atomism, social fragmentation and a public discourse that grows more inclusive and less intelligible at the same time."
--"New York Times"
Praise for Owen Fiss:
"Fiss is one of our most clear-eyed and hard-edged constitutional analysts, and this critique of the damage done to our constitutional heritage in the name of waging a war on terror is the most devastating I have seen."
--Stanley N. Katz, professor of public and international affairs, Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University
"Fiss provides an uncompromising critique of America's struggle to maintain its most fundamental principles during the war on terrorism. Over the course of ten essays, Fiss makes a compelling case for how policies such as military commissions, targeted killing, torture, and warrantless surveillance have exposed rifts in the constitutional fabric. An essential contribution from one of the country's foremost legal scholars."
--Jonathan Hafetz, associate professor of law, Seton Hall University
"Does the Constitution authorize the U.S. government to interfere with privacy, to torture, to try some prisoners before military commissions and to allow others to languish in prison for prolonged, indefinite periods without a trial of any type, and to assassinate some individuals in foreign countries, even U.S. citizens, who are suspected of having engaged in terrorism? Fiss opens a wide-ranging debate on these issues that is crucial for the United States and for billions of persons outside its borders."
--Luis Moreno Ocampo, first Chief Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court
"Owen Fiss has written an important and troubling book."
--Joshua Cohen, co-editor, The Norton Introduction to Philosophy
"Fiss is one of the truly magisterial figures in contemporary American legal academics. He commands nearly universal respect for the depth and lucidity of his intellect, for the integrity and passion of his character, and for the breadth and purity of his scholarship."
--Robert Post, Dean of Yale Law School
Praise for "The Law As It Could Be"
"Owen Fiss is the moral compass of legal liberalism...Fiss calmly makes the case for unvarnished reason as the only and best guide to law and life...[His work reveals] a profound faith that law can be not only the instrument of justice, but actually embody justice itself. Fiss's unswerving commitment to the possibilities of reason, justice, and law is more than timely--it is essential to the very project of the law."
--Noah Feldman, author of "After Jihad: America and the Struggle for Islamic Democracy"
"An uplifting book."
--"Choice"
"Fiss writes in the style of John Marshall, sweeping the reader along with vigorous argumentation."
--"The Law and Politics Book Review"
Praise for "The Irony of Free Speech"
"Powerfully reminds us that the flowering of individual autonomy also has costs--atomism, social fragmentation and a public discourse that grows more inclusive and less intelligible at the same time."
--"New York Times"
"In these extremely relevant pieces, Fiss once again emerges as a fierce defender of freedom."
--Kirkus "This book addresses important legal and ethical questions about the war on terror. It is designed for law students, legal professionals, and readers with a thorough understanding of legal topics. Recommended for law and academic libraries."
--Library Journal
Praise for Owen Fiss:
"Fiss is one of our most clear-eyed and hard-edged constitutional analysts, and this critique of the damage done to our constitutional heritage in the name of waging a war on terror is the most devastating I have seen."
--Stanley N. Katz, professor of public and international affairs, Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University "Fiss provides an uncompromising critique of America's struggle to maintain its most fundamental principles during the war on terrorism. Over the course of ten essays, Fiss makes a compelling case for how policies such as military commissions, targeted killing, torture, and warrantless surveillance have exposed rifts in the constitutional fabric. An essential contribution from one of the country's foremost legal scholars."
--Jonathan Hafetz, associate professor of law, Seton Hall University "Does the Constitution authorize the U.S. government to interfere with privacy, to torture, to try some prisoners before military commissions and to allow others to languish in prison for prolonged, indefinite periods without a trial of any type, and to assassinate some individuals in foreign countries, even U.S. citizens, who are suspected of having engaged in terrorism? Fiss opens a wide-ranging debate on these issues that is crucial for the United States and for billions of persons outside its borders."
--Luis Moreno Ocampo, first Chief Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court "Owen Fiss has written an important and troubling book."
--Joshua Cohen, co-editor, The Norton Introduction to Philosophy "Fiss is one of the truly magisterial figures in contemporary American legal academics. He commands nearly universal respect for the depth and lucidity of his intellect, for the integrity and passion of his character, and for the breadth and purity of his scholarship."
--Robert Post, Dean of Yale Law School "Fiss, a towering figure in the legal academy, brilliantly lays bare how our courts have failed the Constitution in the post-9-11 world."
--Lawrence Douglas, James J. Grosfeld Professor of Law, Jurisprudence, and Social Thought, Amherst College Praise for The Law As It Could Be
"Owen Fiss is the moral compass of legal liberalism...Fiss calmly makes the case for unvarnished reason as the only and best guide to law and life...[His work reveals] a profound faith that law can be not only the instrument of justice, but actually embody justice itself. Fiss's unswerving commitment to the possibilities of reason, justice, and law is more than timely--it is essential to the very project of the law."
--Noah Feldman, author of After Jihad: America and the Struggle for Islamic Democracy "An uplifting book."
--Choice "Fiss writes in the style of John Marshall, sweeping the reader along with vigorous argumentation."
--The Law and Politics Book Review Praise for The Irony of Free Speech
"Powerfully reminds us that the flowering of individual autonomy also has costs--atomism, social fragmentation and a public discourse that grows more inclusive and less intelligible at the same time."
--New York Times
